The experience is probably not significant.Īgain, both are fast enough for me. However, my data set is small and simple. My experience is they're both fast, and duplicacy is faster. However, duplicacy don't keep creation timestamps and there seems no plan to support this. Duplicacy support at least all basic permissions and modification timestamp according to the following two links: Since I only tried Duplicacy for a short time period and my data set is much smaller, I'll answer those questions based on my very limited experience and my knowledge on their design (which means you should have enough test yourself :)Īrq 5 preserves all metas on macOS. Thanks in advance and sorry for cross-posting. What are your experiences and which software (mybe other?) can you recommend? A GUI is nice to have - I'm experienced at the command line. The restore performance should (hopefully) not be an issue. Is there a possibility to limit the network bandwith during backup? How is the CPU / IO workload during the backups (scanning 600GB files)? Mac is rebooted / shut down during the backup process)? How does Arq / Duplicacy handle a resume of a canceled backup (e.g. How is the performance for the continuing backups? How is the initial performance for 600GB data? Support for macOS extended file attributes? My questions regarding the differences between Arq 5 and Duplicacy for the offsite backup: I'm a macOS user with about 600GB data and a local (USB) Time machine backup.įor an offsite backup solution, there is a Synology NAS (SSH / SFTP, Minio with S3 is an option) available at the other house. I'm struggling with the decision between Arq 5 (version 6 seems to have stability issues) and Duplicacy:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |